The Myth of the Parker Palate

 
Wednesday, June 24th, 2009 at 4:27:27 PM
by Joe Czerwinski

picture-9.png

Around two years ago, when I first traveled to Australia, I was struck by the number of winemakers asking my opinions regarding Robert Parker. Not the famous mystery writer–whose books never seem long enough to last me through an entire trip–the other one, who has made a 30-year career out of dispensing vinous advice to consumers.

On the one hand, I was a little taken aback. Although most folks brought up the topic diplomatically enough (“We’re not trying to make a huge, Parkerized style…” followed later by “So what do you think of his tastes, anyway?”), it was still somewhat disconcerting, being asked to comment on another critic’s critiques and preferences.

For the most part, folks Down Under seemed to think that Parker favored only the biggest, boldest, most dramatic and opulent wines–wines possessing the darkest color, ripest fruit, highest extract and elevated levels of alcohol. Even though Jay Miller is now reviewing Australian wines for Parker’s The Wine Advocate, little has changed in that public’s perception.

That appears true in this country, as well. Witness the latest item on Tyler Colman’s Dr. Vino blog, in which he and his illustrious dining/tasting companions taste a series of Argentine wines reviewed previously by Miller and conclude that “there was general agreement that the first wine tasted the best and that the last wine tasted different, more extracted, more dense, and bigger. ‘The wine that Miller would have liked the most,’ as one taster put it.” And yet that wine was a wine that Miller had dropped a 62-point bombshell on.

Predicting critics’ likes and dislikes–and especially making or marketing wines based on such suppositions–is fraught with peril. Yes, if one follows certain critics you can find common themes, but there are always exceptions. Haut Brion is one of Parker’s favorite Bordeaux, but it doesn’t have the power, size or muscle of Latour. In my own tastings, some rich, powerful and alcoholic wines come out on top, while others seem overripe, overblown and out of balance. More is not always more, sometimes it is too much.

Be Sociable, Share!

    2 Responses to “The Myth of the Parker Palate”

    1. Update: Miller has retasted the wine in question and given it a 90-point score. You can find the whole story behind this at (and way more) on Mark Squires’ Bulletin Board on eRobertParker.com.

    2. 2 francois Blachon said:

      If we compare wine and music :Parker like only “Wagner”
      could you hear Wagner all the day long ?
      I also like Bach ,Vivaldi,country,jazz….I think that a winelover has to be openminded and eclectic.

    Posting Your Comment
    Please Wait

    Leave a Comment

    There was an error with your comment, please try again.


    Advertise on UnReserved!

    Recent Comments:
    • H.Scott: If you are operating a fine dining restaurant, then I completely agree with #1. The table should be ready...
    • Stephen: #1 Is wrong. If the restaurant is busy, it’s busy. A restaurant gets behind for a number of reasons. No...
    • castelloblue: goes great with some castello blue cheese! (:
    • Larry Stuto: Sorry It Is a 2010,Shenandoah Valley,Ca. Produced and bottled at Drytown Cellars,Drytown Calif.
    • Larry Stuto: Has anyone tried the Tempranillo from Drytown Vineyards in Drytown,Calif. How about there wines in...


    WorldOfWine